Which statement is true regarding Sudafed sales logbooks during a system malfunction?

The correct statement regarding Sudafed sales logbooks during a system malfunction is that logbooks can be used to track sales. This practice ensures that the pharmacy complies with federal and state regulations, especially in monitoring the sales of pseudoephedrine products, which are regulated due to their potential use in the illegal manufacture of methamphetamine.

In situations where the electronic tracking system is down, maintaining a logbook is essential for documenting sales accurately. This allows for a continuous record of the transactions, which is critical for accountability and compliance with legal requirements. It supports pharmacies in adhering to the limit on sales quantities and helps to provide a trail of sales that can be reviewed if necessary.

The other options do not effectively address the necessity of tracking sales during a system malfunction. Stating that logbooks should not be used dismisses the importance of maintaining a record, while claiming they must be signed off by a pharmacy manager may introduce unnecessary steps that could hinder the recording process. Optioning that logbooks are optional undermines the requirement for proper documentation during any operational issues. Thus, using logbooks to track sales is the most appropriate and compliant action during such instances.